La NHL ⇒ [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
- John Duff
- Messages : 598
- Inscription : 02 févr. 2012, 21:33
- Equipe(s) NFL : :nfljac: :nflcar:
- Equipe(s) NHL : :nhlott:
- Equipe(s) MLB : :mlbmia: :mlbmil: :mlbcin:
- Equipe(s) CFB : CAL, FSU
- Autre(s) équipes : FC Barcelona, RC Lens, Rugby Club Toulonnais
- Localisation : Toulon/Marseille
- Âge : 34
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
J'avoue que le but c'est chaud quand même. Surtout après vidéo quoi.
Mais les pesky Sens sont là. Je ne vais pas crier victoire trop vite mais toute victoire est bonne à prendre.
Moi qui pensais qu'on se feraient sortir en 5 matchs
Mais les pesky Sens sont là. Je ne vais pas crier victoire trop vite mais toute victoire est bonne à prendre.
Moi qui pensais qu'on se feraient sortir en 5 matchs
"Welcome to Duval, prepare to be hit."
- Formello
- Messages : 8741
- Inscription : 31 janv. 2012, 21:06
- Equipe(s) NFL : Arizona Cardinals
- Equipe(s) NHL : Arizona Coyotes
- Equipe(s) NBA : Phoenix Suns
- Equipe(s) MLB : Arizona Diamondbacks
- Equipe(s) CFB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Equipe(s) CBB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Autre(s) équipes : Phoenix Mercury, Arizona Rattlers, SS Lazio, Colombie, US Carcassonne XV
- Localisation : Carcassonne
- Gender :
- Âge : 46
- Contact :
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
même si je n'ai vu que des highlights de cette série........on peut dire que le retour au jeu de Karlsson fait du bien à Ottawa!!!!!!!
- Formello
- Messages : 8741
- Inscription : 31 janv. 2012, 21:06
- Equipe(s) NFL : Arizona Cardinals
- Equipe(s) NHL : Arizona Coyotes
- Equipe(s) NBA : Phoenix Suns
- Equipe(s) MLB : Arizona Diamondbacks
- Equipe(s) CFB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Equipe(s) CBB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Autre(s) équipes : Phoenix Mercury, Arizona Rattlers, SS Lazio, Colombie, US Carcassonne XV
- Localisation : Carcassonne
- Gender :
- Âge : 46
- Contact :
- pilou05
- Messages : 378
- Inscription : 22 juil. 2012, 18:34
- Equipe(s) NFL : PHI
- Equipe(s) NHL : OTT STL PHI
- Equipe(s) NBA : BOS
- Autre(s) équipes : Rapaces de Gap(Magnus) Lions Lyon (D1 Hockey) Alouettes MTL(CFL) Impact Mtl (MLS) Red Bulls NY (MLS)
- Localisation : Montréal / Gap
- Âge : 31
- Contact :
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
Le but de "Zidanejad" est valable. Il marque du patin, mais il faut que le mouvement soit net, il ne l'est pas. Stricte application du règlement. Et puis c'est pas les arbitres pour le coup mais la ligue à Toronto. Apres cette saison les arbitres ont globalement était pourri j'ai trouvé, entre la nouvelle règle sur l'obstruction, les mises en jeu qui prennent 3 plombes, les divers "coups salops"....
- Formello
- Messages : 8741
- Inscription : 31 janv. 2012, 21:06
- Equipe(s) NFL : Arizona Cardinals
- Equipe(s) NHL : Arizona Coyotes
- Equipe(s) NBA : Phoenix Suns
- Equipe(s) MLB : Arizona Diamondbacks
- Equipe(s) CFB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Equipe(s) CBB : Arizona State Sun Devils
- Autre(s) équipes : Phoenix Mercury, Arizona Rattlers, SS Lazio, Colombie, US Carcassonne XV
- Localisation : Carcassonne
- Gender :
- Âge : 46
- Contact :
- Snowflake
- Administrateur du site
- Messages : 4060
- Inscription : 25 janv. 2012, 22:26
- Equipe(s) NFL : MIA, SF
- Equipe(s) NHL : PIT
- Equipe(s) NBA : PHO, LAL
- Equipe(s) MLB : OAK
- Equipe(s) CFB : USC, ND, Boise State, Michigan
- Equipe(s) CBB : Butler, Michigan
- Autre(s) équipes : ES Tunis, Man Utd, OM...
- Localisation : Tunis, Tunisie
- Gender :
- Âge : 44
- Contact :
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
oh le GIF ! excellent !
OTT me fait énormément penser aux Sens de 2007 je crois quand ils ont été en finale ! MTL a été une grosse déception par contre...
sinon @Pilou05 ancienne ou nouvelle, j'avoue que je n'ai jamais compris la règle de l'obstruction (enfin interference) au hockey... de toute les règles c'est celle qui m'échappe le plus... je suis incapable d'expliquer à quelqu'un quand il peut y avoir interference (à part celle sur le gardien bien entendu) donc si tu pouvais m'éclairer stp ?
OTT me fait énormément penser aux Sens de 2007 je crois quand ils ont été en finale ! MTL a été une grosse déception par contre...
sinon @Pilou05 ancienne ou nouvelle, j'avoue que je n'ai jamais compris la règle de l'obstruction (enfin interference) au hockey... de toute les règles c'est celle qui m'échappe le plus... je suis incapable d'expliquer à quelqu'un quand il peut y avoir interference (à part celle sur le gardien bien entendu) donc si tu pouvais m'éclairer stp ?
- John Duff
- Messages : 598
- Inscription : 02 févr. 2012, 21:33
- Equipe(s) NFL : :nfljac: :nflcar:
- Equipe(s) NHL : :nhlott:
- Equipe(s) MLB : :mlbmia: :mlbmil: :mlbcin:
- Equipe(s) CFB : CAL, FSU
- Autre(s) équipes : FC Barcelona, RC Lens, Rugby Club Toulonnais
- Localisation : Toulon/Marseille
- Âge : 34
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
Si seulement ça pouvait être vrai et se réaliser à la fin des P.OSnowflake a écrit :OTT me fait énormément penser aux Sens de 2007 je crois quand ils ont été en finale !
"Welcome to Duval, prepare to be hit."
- pilou05
- Messages : 378
- Inscription : 22 juil. 2012, 18:34
- Equipe(s) NFL : PHI
- Equipe(s) NHL : OTT STL PHI
- Equipe(s) NBA : BOS
- Autre(s) équipes : Rapaces de Gap(Magnus) Lions Lyon (D1 Hockey) Alouettes MTL(CFL) Impact Mtl (MLS) Red Bulls NY (MLS)
- Localisation : Montréal / Gap
- Âge : 31
- Contact :
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
Snow je t'avoue moi aussi j'ai du mal avec cette règle, et la nouvelle règle plus stricte n'a fait qu'embrouiller encore plus la situation.
en tout cas voici ce que dit le réglement de la NHL
en tout cas voici ce que dit le réglement de la NHL
Rule 56 – Interference
56.1 Interference - A strict standard on acts of interference must be
adhered to in all areas of the rink.
Body Position: Body position shall be determined as the player skating in front of or beside his opponent, traveling in the same direction. A player who is behind an opponent, who does not have the puck, may not use his stick, body or free hand in order to restrain his opponent, but must skate in order to gain or reestablish his proper position in order to make a check. A player is allowed the ice he is standing on (body position) and is not required to move in order to let an opponent proceed. A player may “block” the path of an opponent provided he is in front of his opponent and moving in the same direction. Moving laterally and without establishing body position, then making contact with the non-puck carrier is not permitted and will be penalized as interference. A player is always entitled to use his body position to lengthen an opponent’s path to the puck, provided his stick is not utilized (to make himself “bigger” and therefore considerably lengthening the distance his opponent must travel to get where he is going); his free hand is not used and he does not take advantage of his body position to deliver an otherwise illegal check.
Possession of the Puck:
The last player to touch the puck, other than the goalkeeper, shall be considered the player in possession. The player deemed in possession of the puck may be checked legally, provided the check is rendered immediately following his loss of possession.
Restrain:
The actions of a player who does not have body position, but instead uses illegal means (e.g. hook with stick; hold with hands, trip with the stick or in any manner) to impede an opponent who is not in possession of the puck. Illegal means are acts which allow a player or goalkeeper to establish, maintain or restore body position other than by skating. Pick: A “pick” is the action of a player who checks an opponent who is not in possession of the puck and is unaware of the impending check/hit. A player who is aware of an impending hit, not deemed to be a legal “battle for the puck,” may not be interfered with by a player or goalkeeper delivering a “pick.” A player delivering a “pick” is one who moves into an opponent’s path without initially having body position, thereby taking him out of the play. When this is done, an interference penalty shall be assessed.
Free Hand:
When a free hand is used to hold, pull, tug, grab or physically restrain an opponent from moving freely, this must be penalized as holding. The free hand may be used by a player to “fend off” an opponent or his stick, but may not be used to hold an opponent’s stick or body.
Stick:
A player who does not have body position on his opponent, who uses his stick (either the blade or the shaft, including the butt-end of the shaft) to impede or prevent his opponent from moving freely on the ice shall be assessed a hooking penalty.
56.2 Minor Penalty -
A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who interferes with or impedes the progress of an opponent who is not in possession of the puck.
A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who restrains an opponent who is attempting to “fore-check.”
A minor penalty shall be imposed on an attacking player who deliberately checks a defensive player, including the goalkeeper, who is not in possession of the puck.
A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who shall cause an opponent who is not in possession of the puck to be forced off-side, causing a stoppage in play. If this action causes a delayed off-side (and not necessarily a stoppage in play), then the application of a penalty for interference is subject to the judgment of the Referee.
A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who deliberately knocks a stick out of an opponent’s hand, or who prevents a player who has dropped his stick or any other piece of equipment from regaining possession of it.
A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who knocks or shoots any abandoned or broken stick or illegal puck or other debris towards an opposing puck carrier in a manner that could cause him to be distracted. (See also Rule 53 – Throwing Equipment.)
A minor penalty shall be imposed on any identifiable player on the players’ bench or penalty bench who, by means of his stick or his body, interferes with the movements of the puck or any opponent on the ice during the progress of the play. In addition, should a player about to come onto the ice, play the puck while one or both skates are still on the players’ or penalty bench, a minor penalty for interference shall be assessed. The appropriate penalty according to the playing rules shall be assessed when a player on the players’ or penalty bench gets involved with an opponent on the ice during a stoppage in play. The player(s) involved may be subject to additional sanctions as appropriate pursuant to Rule 28 – Supplementary discipline.
- Snowflake
- Administrateur du site
- Messages : 4060
- Inscription : 25 janv. 2012, 22:26
- Equipe(s) NFL : MIA, SF
- Equipe(s) NHL : PIT
- Equipe(s) NBA : PHO, LAL
- Equipe(s) MLB : OAK
- Equipe(s) CFB : USC, ND, Boise State, Michigan
- Equipe(s) CBB : Butler, Michigan
- Autre(s) équipes : ES Tunis, Man Utd, OM...
- Localisation : Tunis, Tunisie
- Gender :
- Âge : 44
- Contact :
Re: [2013 EAST QF] #2 Montréal Canadiens vs #7 Ottawa Senators
bon, on n'est pas sortie de l'auberge !!! quand je lis certaines phrases (en plus d'avoir mal à la tête) j'ai l'impression que presque tous les contacts en NHL serait des interferance non sifflé ! faudrait un sujet dédié à décortiquer cette règle !